June 5, 2018
By James Mintert & Michael Langemeier
The May reading of the Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer was 141, 16 points higher than in April 2018 and the highest barometer value since January 2017. The rise in the barometer, a sentiment index derived from a monthly survey of 400 agricultural producers across the U.S., was driven both by producers improved view of current conditions and, especially, their more optimistic view of the future. The Index of Current Conditions rose to 132 during May, 9 points higher than in April while the Index of Future Expectations climbed to a reading of 145, 19 points higher than a month earlier. This was the highest future expectations reading since February 2017.
Over time, the percentage of respondents reporting that their farms’ financial condition is worse than a year earlier has drifted lower as has the percentage of respondents expecting further deterioration in the year ahead. On the May survey, 36% of respondents reported that their farms’ financial condition was worse than a year earlier, down 5% from a month earlier and the lowest percentage reporting worsening financial conditions since the survey began in October 2015.
When asked to look ahead 12 months, the percentage of producers expecting their farm to be in worse financial condition a year from now fell to 18% in May, down from 23% a month earlier. Responding to the same question, the percentage of producers expecting their farm to be in better financial shape a year from now rose from 23% in April to 30% in May, the highest percentage since February 2017.
At least part of the sentiment improvement detected on the May survey is attributable to producers improved perspective regarding how the U.S. agricultural economy is likely to perform, both over the course of the next 12 months and the upcoming five years. Looking ahead 12 months, 32% of producers expect good times in U.S. agriculture, up from 25% a month earlier. When asked to look ahead 5 years, 51% of respondents said they expect good times in U.S. agriculture compared to 44% who felt that way in April.
The improvement in overall sentiment on the part of producers had little impact on their perspective regarding whether now is a good or bad time to make large investments on their farms. Responding to this question on the May survey, 27% of producers said now is a good time to make large farm investments compared to 28% who felt that way in April and 67% of respondents said now is a bad time to make large investments compared to 69% who responded that way one month earlier.
Rating the safety net
This month’s survey included several questions related to the Farm Bill debates taking place in Congress. First, producers were asked to rate how effective the current U.S. Farm Bill, passed in 2014, is at providing producers with a financial safety net. On a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is “not at all effective” and 9 is “very effective”, two-fifths of the respondents said the current farm bill was not effective (a rating of 4 or less) and just 25% of respondents said the current farm program provided an effective financial safety net (a rating of 6 or higher).
To provide a frame of reference for these responses, when this question was posed in November 2016 and again in November 2017, 47% and 45% of those surveyed, respectively, thought the 2014 Farm Bill was not effective in providing a financial safety net.
When asked more specifically for their evaluation of the current ARC-County and PLC income support programs included in the 2014 Farm Bill, only one-quarter of the respondents said these programs were effective (a score of 6 or higher) in providing a financial safety net and nearly one-third said they were not effective (a score of 4 or less).
Crop insurance vital
Possible revisions to the crop insurance program are also an integral part of Farm Bill discussions. Producers who purchased crop insurance in 2018 were asked to rate the effectiveness of the current crop insurance program in providing a financial safety net on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is “not at all effective” and 9 is “very effective”. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents indicated that crop insurance is effective (score of 6 or higher) while just 17% of respondents said it was not effective (score of 4 or less).
Producers who purchased crop insurance in 2018 were asked what they would do if next year’s crop insurance premium increased by 50%. A majority of respondents - 54% - said the premium increase would cause them to change the insurance product or coverage level that they choose. One-fifth of the respondents said they would not make any change in their insurance coverage in response to a 50% premium increase. Just more than one-fourth – 26% - of respondents said they would not purchase crop insurance next year if their cost increased by 50%.
Source: Purdue/CME Group
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
Soybeans climb on South American weather woesJan 18, 2023
USDA exports – Unknown buys soybeans, November 28, 2023Jan 19, 2023
Weather hinders record South American exportsNov 28, 2023
Create a winning 2024 grain marketing planNov 28, 2023