is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist

Ethanol wins big: Cox-Waxman amendment defeated

Before recessing in early August, the U.S. House of Representatives defeated a controversial amendment that “renewable fuels” advocates say would effectively put ethanol and biodiesel fuels back in limbo.

The so-called “Cox-Waxman amendment,” offered by Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Christopher Cox, R-Calif., would have given California a waiver from federal reformulated gasoline requirements (RFG).

California interests took the state's long-standing request for waiver directly to Congress after the Environmental Protection Agency earlier this summer denied the state's request for exemption from the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act.

The Cox-Waxman amendment would have been tacked to the pending Renewable Fuels for Energy Security Act.

Look-alike renewable fuels bills in both houses of Congress would increase renewable fuels, including ethanol and biodiesel.

The energy bill proposes that renewables — or fuel and fuel additives processed from grains and soybeans — account for 3 percent of highway transportation fuels by 2011 and 5 percent by 2016.

The amendment was defeated by a vote 300 to 125. Opposition came from both sides of the isle with support coming from the leadership of both parties.

Much of the debate focused on concerns that the Cox-Waxman amendment was for California only.

Lawmakers who opposed the amendment spoke strongly about the benefits of the RFG program and referred to a letter from EPA Administrator Christine Whitman calling for the amendment's defeat.

“The federal RFG program has been an extremely successful and cost-effective program that has provided substantial air quality benefits to millions of people throughout the country,” Whitman said.

National Corn Growers President Lee Klein of Battle Creek, Neb., said the defeat of the amendment was a victory for U.S. grain producers. “This was a hard-fought victory for corn growers who have worked to defeat this amendment in subcommittee, in full committee, and finally on the floor of the House,” he said.


Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.