is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist

Elimination of agricultural subsidies

The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) recently conducted a study ("Impact of Alternative Agricultural Policies on Developing Countries," April 2, 2003) that examined this hypothesis. They used a model to look at the impact of a policy that required developed countries to remove protectionist measures and trade-distorting subsidies by 2006 while developing countries maintained their existing policies.

These restrictions are more strict than any that are being talked about in the current round of trade negotiations. As a result one would expect this study to reflect the maximum benefit that might come from the elimination of subsidies.

How did corn do? You might be surprised at the answer. Corn producers in developing countries would experience a price increase of 2.9 percent after 20 years. These mere traces of price movement, less than a nickel a bushel in 20 years, would be of little help in improving incomes of farmers in developing countries. By 2020, the price to U.S. farmers would decline by 9.5 percent.

The price gain for other crops in developing countries was even less than it was for corn. Producers in developing countries would gain 1.6 percent in the price of rice, 0.8 percent for wheat, and 1.1 percent for other coarse grains.

The picture for meat and dairy commodities is completely different. Baseline policies cause larger trade distortions for meat and milk compared to cereal. Thus it is no surprise that the complete removal of all protective barriers results in significant price impacts for some products.

World dairy prices experienced the largest change, increasing 19.2 percent by 2020. World price gains of beef, sheep, and goats were more modest, increasing 5.2 percent by 2020 while the gains for poultry and pork were 3.8 percent and 0.4 percent respectively. Notice the year here - 2020! If the trade negotiators making changes in the subsidy levels in developed countries are expecting strong benefits for developing countries, they may be disappointed in the results of their efforts.

Daryll E. Ray holds the Blasingame Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Policy, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, and is the Director of UT's Agricultural Policy Analysis Center. To learn more about APAC, visit


Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.