Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: East

Drip irrigation a winner in corn?

As every grower knows, corn in the Rio Grande Valley is typically flood irrigated, using the reasoning that a drip system would not be economically feasible. But farmers may have to re-evaluate the situation since lack of water in the Valley is making it necessary to think out of the box.

With the need to be visionary, Texas Cooperative Extension began an experiment under the leadership of Charles Stichler, agronomist at Uvalde, and Guy Fipps, Extension engineer at College Station. Farmer Charles Loop and sons of Brownsville, Texas, with supplies and expertise of T-Systems International and High-Tech Irrigation, planted a 10-acre corn demonstration project in February under drip irrigation on Loop’s land. They used an electric pump, hooked up to underground irrigation tape, which metered out water and fertilizer to corn roots in exact amounts.

Early reports indicate the crop is utilizing fertilizer effectively and water savings are dramatic. Besides that, the Loops have not put a tractor across the land since the corn was planted – no cultivation, no furrows.

Exact amounts of water mean less stress to the plants and better management of diseases. Although the jury is still out, everyone involved assumes that the system will save money on both fertilizer and labor. And a side advantage is that the corn will use less fertilizer but what is used will be going directly to the roots. That means better efficiency and less runoff carried into the environment.

And the crop is looking great!

Travis Miller, Texas Cooperative Extension agronomist from College Station, is optimistic. “It looks like drip will be successful,” he says. “The plants are about 18 to 24 inches higher than in furrow irrigated corn, and water use has been cut in half: only about 7.25 inches using drip tape, compared to almost 14 inches with furrow irrigation.”

The economics of the situation, though, is what the farmers are concerned about. They all ask, “Can we afford it?”

“It’s going to take 10.5 bushels more per acre to pay for this,” says Miller. “But from what I’ve seen, we’ll even get a higher yield.” But even more important, says Miller, is the effect this could potentially have on the problem of aflatoxin. “Less stress to the plant generally means less disease.” And drip irrigation, with its emission of exact amounts of water, is a great stress reducer.

Miller also believes it might even be possible to deliver fungicide to the corn roots the same way fertilizer is delivered, which would also reduce the incidents and damage of aflatoxin.

Valley corn growers have been virtually knocked out of the food grade corn business as a result of aflatoxin. “This (drip experiment) could end up being a huge benefit to Valley growers,” says Miller. “If we can control aflatoxin, they’ll be back in business again. It could bump the price by 50 cents per bushel. And that would be significant.”

The future for drip irrigation in corn looks promising, yet Miller doesn’t want to jump to preliminary conclusions since data won’t be analyzed until the corn is harvested. And even that may be too soon. He thinks they’ll need a couple of years of study and plenty of comparisons to come to any definite conclusions. In the meantime, Miller is optimistic enough that he is considering a field study of the same type in the College Station area.

e-mail: [email protected]

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.