Farm Progress

Analysis: Soil disease index can accurately predict root disease potential in sugarbeets, particularly rhizoctonia root and crown rot.

December 13, 2017

3 Min Read
EARLY DETECTION: Rhizoctonia root and crown root is one of the most widespread, consistently damaging sugarbeet diseases. Once the fungal pathogen is established, it's difficult to manage.prudko/istock/thinkstock

By Robert Harveson

Rhizoctonia root and crown rot, caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani, is commonly found worldwide. In Nebraska, it is the most widespread, consistently damaging sugarbeet disease and has been problematic for producers for more than 100 years.

Due to its presence in the soil, once R. solani becomes established, it is difficult, if not impossible, to eradicate. So managing it effectively before severe damage occurs is also challenging. One method for managing RRCR is a predictive technique, referred to as the soil disease index.

The disease index is a preplant soil test that was developed by the plant pathology lab at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Panhandle Research and Extension Center (PHREC). This test is conducted in the greenhouse using soils to be planted to sugar beets the following spring, with the purpose of identifying and estimating relative pathogen populations in the soil and predicting the potential for root disease problems caused by these same soil-borne pathogens later in the season.

We have the ability to monitor for Fusarium, Aphanomyces, and Pythium; however, the test is particularly useful for estimating risk of disease problems caused by Rhizoctonia. We began this concept as a service for the growers in 2003, and to date have analyzed well over 3,600 soil samples, each representing one sugarbeet field.

Index methodology
The soil samples should be taken from the upper 4- to 6-inch depth from multiple locations within a field to give a better representation of the entire field, similar to samples taken for fertility analysis. The collected samples are brought to the PHREC plant pathology diagnostic lab in Scottsbluff, and are planted with a susceptible cultivar and maintained for four weeks.

Seedlings are observed daily, and pathogens identified after symptoms appear. An index was developed based on the time period during the 30-day test that seedlings became infected and was calculated on a zero to 100 scale.

We have designed a risk assessment system (high, medium and low) for each tested field based on the disease index values obtained from the soil assay. We consider an index value of 30 to 45 to represent a moderate risk of disease problems from these pathogens later in the season. Anything above 45 would represent a high risk, while any values below 30 would be considered to pose a low risk.

Comparing index values with yield
To validate our concept, preplant index values were compared with yields obtained from the same fields after harvest. Results revealed a strong inverse relationship between the preplant disease index values and sucrose and root yields, but not sucrose percentage. This means that the fields with higher disease index values also resulted in lower root yields and total sugar per acre.

As an example, after further analysis with linear regression of the data, our test showed that for each single unit increase in the disease index, a corresponding decrease of 0.12 ton (240 pounds) per acre and 44 pounds sucrose per acre, respectively, was observed.

The take-home message is that we feel the disease index can accurately predict root disease potential, particularly rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Another example of the benefit for this test to consider is those low-risk fields. Based on our results, we would anticipate that no action would be required for low-risk fields, thereby saving the cost of any unnecessary treatment.

More importantly, our studies suggest that the information obtained from the tests will assist growers with making management decisions based on the disease index predictions. Therefore, we will continue this service for as long as there is an interest in using it.

Harveson is a Nebraska Extension plant pathologist at the Panhandle Research and Extension Center.

This report comes from Panhandle Perspectives, a regular column by University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension specialists and educators in western Nebraska.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like