Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: United States
rye cover crop data University of Minnesota
Two-year corn yield for continuous corn (CC) and corn-soybean rotation (CSb) with and without a rye cover crop present between fall and spring before corn seeding.

Rye cover crop impact on nitrogen leaching and corn yield

University of Minnesota study shows reduction of nitrogen leaching when using the cover crop in a corn, soybean rotation.

By Natalie Ricks and Fabián Fernández, University of Minnesota

In Minnesota, approximately 500,000 acres of irrigated farmland are highly productive but susceptible to nitrate leaching to groundwater. Irrigated sandy soils are especially vulnerable to leaching. A recent study from University of Minnesota, with support from Pope County SWCD and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, evaluated the use of winter rye as a cover crop in corn production. Early results show that a rye cover crop can help reduce nitrogen leaching in a corn after soybean rotation by 45 percent.

The study was conducted in 2016, an optimal year for corn, and 2017, a wetter and colder year. At the end of each season, the data were analyzed to determine what effect treatments had on nitrogen leaching, yield and economic optimum nitrogen rates (EONR). The addition of rye to a continuous corn (CC) rotation had no effect on nitrate leaching. However, under a corn/soybean (CSb) rotation, rye reduced nitrate leaching by 45 percent for 2016-17. This is likely because rye residue is tying up residual nitrate early in the spring when there is high precipitation and little crop uptake. As the season continues, the rye decomposes and nitrogen is released into the system when the plants are consuming nutrients. This allows the plants to utilize the nutrients, rather than losing them through leaching.

The preliminary data show promising results with rye decreasing nitrate leaching without negatively impacting yield or EONR. We found that rye had no effect on corn yield in either rotation. The presence of rye had an inconsistent effect on the EONR. In 2016, the EONR for rye plots in corn-soybean rotation was 50 lbs nitrogen/acre less than the conventional (no rye) treatments. In 2017, the EONR for rye plots in the rotation was 17 lbs N/acre greater than for no rye treatments.

So, why winter rye? Rye can survive the cold Minnesota winters, it is a vigorous nitrogen scavenger during critical nutrient loss (spring and fall) and it can be managed with chemical and mechanical termination.

Along with the rye cover crop, the crops received urease treated urea in four split applications at corn development stages V2, V6, V8, and V12. Nitrogen rates of 0, 90, 180, 225, and 270 lbs N/acre were used to predict the EONR.

What does this mean for your operation? In this study, the use of cereal rye on irrigated soils worked best for a corn-soybean rotation. The use of fertigation to apply N in multiple split applications over the growing season may also help to reduce N loss. Researchers continue to evaluate new practices for nitrogen and water quality management. With the goal of helping farms perform more efficiently and reducing agricultural pollution, we will continue to investigate best management practices.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.