Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: IA
young corn plants in field
IOWA POLL: A new survey focuses on soil conservation efforts on rented land and how practices have changed from 2016 to 2018.

Conservation increasing, but rented land remains a barrier

Survey shows farmers are less likely to invest in conservation on land they rent.

As the percentage of rented farmland in Iowa continues to grow, farmers are seeing a steady shift in who is responsible for what happens on the land.

According to the 2018 Iowa Farm and Rural Life Poll, SOC 3090, a publication of Iowa State University Extension, 46% of respondents said they rented farmland in 2017, up from 45% in 2013, the last time they were asked this question. On average, those who responded rented 431 acres in 2017, compared to 392 acres in 2013.

The statement, “If conservation practices are needed on the land I rent, it is my responsibility,” received 72% agreement in the 2018 poll, slightly higher than the 67% who agreed in 2008. Conversely, 29% agreed in the 2018 poll, that conservation practices are the landlord’s responsibility, down from 38% in 2008.

“Together, these results indicate that tenants perceive an increase in their responsibility for conservation actions and a decline in their landlords’ responsibility. But that doesn’t mean that conservation is getting done,” says J. Arbuckle, ISU Extension sociologist, and the report’s primary author.

The most recent poll was published in May. Known also as the “Farm Poll,” the survey has been conducted since 1982, and is the longest-running survey of its kind in the nation. For this latest poll, questionnaires were mailed in February to 2,151 farmers, and the response rate was 50%, with an average age of respondents of 66.

Conservation investments on rented land

Although farmers may perceive a shift in who is responsible for conservation, the poll shows they are less likely to invest in conservation on the land they rent. Nearly half (47%) of respondents said they were less likely to spend their own money on structural conservation practices such as grassed waterways and terraces on rented land, and 42% said they would be less likely to use cover crops on rented land.

Farmers were also asked to compare their landlord’s priorities regarding income and land stewardship. Around 38% said they felt their landlord placed land stewardship ahead of income, a decrease from 44% in 2008. The number of farmers who said their landlord “requires” them to minimize impacts on soil and water quality dropped from 46% in 2008 to 32% in 2018.

“There appears to be a feeling among farmers that landlord commitment to conservation is declining,” Arbuckle says. “Considered along with their lower likelihood to invest in structural practices or cover crops, the data suggest that conservation practice use on rented land is sub-optimal.”

Making strides

Despite the shifts in perceived responsibility for conservation on rented land, farmers reported measurable increases in their use of in-field and edge-of-field conservation practices.

Of the farmers surveyed, 50% reported no-till on at least some of the land they farm, up from 42% in 2015. Other notable results were an increase in the use of nitrogen rate calculators (18% to 26%) and in-season nitrogen application (28% to 35%).

Arbuckle says the results are encouraging, and likely reflect the efforts that farmers and ag stakeholders have made to help meet the goals of the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy. He says the results show farmers still have a long way to go with conservation, but “they’re definitely making strides.”

Other topics covered in the 2018 Farm Poll summary include perceptions of quality of life and farm financial well-being, awareness of and participation in watershed management activities, and use of precision agriculture practices.

Source: ISU, which is responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and its subsidiaries aren’t responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.




Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.