Sponsored By
Delta Farm Press Logo

Moisture sensors offer ROI the first year

Soil moisture sensors, properly installed and maintained in crop fields, may pay for themselves in the first year, according to a University of Georgia Extension educator.

Ron Smith

February 18, 2020

3 Min Read
dfp-ronsmith-david-hall.jpg
David Hall, left, and Wesley Porter, University of Georgia Extension specialists, discussed irrigation scheduling methods at the National Conservation Systems Cotton and Rice Conference.Ron Smith

Soil moisture sensors, properly installed and maintained, may pay for themselves in the first year, according to a University of Georgia Extension county water educator.

David Hall, who also farms, said moisture sensors "are worth the investment." Hall explained sensor advantages during the recent National Conservation Systems Cotton and Rice Conference in Memphis, Tenn.

He says some farmers may be reluctant to add soil moisture sensors to their irrigation management program. "I believe in a lot of the old folks' thinking," Hall says. "I also embrace 'feasible technology.' I believe in taking a few risks and using new technology."

He says the best reason to adopt irrigation management methods is to see a return on investment. "Irrigation is a good choice, a sustainable practice that helps farmers stay in business."

Taking full advantage of that system, however, requires management. "Farmers might wonder if they could have waited a day or two to irrigate, for instance."

Irrigation scheduling

Producers have used several methods to schedule irrigation, Hall says. The checkbook method, knowing what's available "in the bank," may be helpful but "doesn't account for atmospheric conditions."

He also notes that producers may water more than necessary. "In some years, we've seen dryland acreage yield better than irrigated. Monitoring soil moisture with probes seems logical to prevent watering too much or not enough."

Related:Moisture Sensors useful irrigation scheduling tool

He says one trial shows that in the first year with soil moisture sensors cotton yields increased by 150 to 200 pounds per acre.

Hall looks at the cost of the system for a field slightly more than 100 acres. The base costs $450. Three sensors at $525 each, total $1,575. A data plan, $25 a month for seven months, is $175. Total for the system is $2,200.

He says producers will replace sensors about every three to four years. He figures at $16.24 per acre, sensors "should pay for themselves in the first year."

He estimates increased corn yield at 4 bushels per acre, cotton at 23 pounds and 82 more pounds of peanuts will pay for the system. Producers also may save on irrigation costs.

"The University of Georgia estimates a $40 to $60 per acre increase in revenue with moisture sensors," Hall says. "And they may reduce irrigation applications. It's easy to see a return on investment."

Important factors

Hall says producers help themselves by understanding several key factors.

• Know your soils, understand how they react.

• Assess your water supply.

• Make certain the pivot works properly where you place the sensors.

• Time is important.

• Install the units correctly.

• Monitor and react to the data.

• Trust the system. If you doubt, dig and investigate.

• Watch weather trends and soil temperatures. Updates are available every two hours to assist in anticipating irrigation and timing the next watering event.

• The soil type entered into the data bank suggests when to initiate irrigation.

• Know the soil moisture holding capacity to know how much water to apply.

• NEVER GET BEHIND.

Hall recommends producers who are interested in adding soil moisture sensors should "do the homework. Talk to an irrigation specialist, industry representative or a farmer who is using sensors. Trust it and use some kind of irrigation scheduling system."

Hall says farmers have opportunities to adapt and to adopt. "They adapt because they have to. They adopt because they want to. They choose to do something that will benefit them — irrigation or scouting, for instance."

Installing moisture sensors, he says, offers farmers an opportunity to adopt technology that improves profit potential and conserves water.

About the Author(s)

Ron Smith

Editor, Farm Progress

Ron Smith has spent more than 30 years covering Sunbelt agriculture. Ron began his career in agricultural journalism as an Experiment Station and Extension editor at Clemson University, where he earned a Masters Degree in English in 1975. He served as associate editor for Southeast Farm Press from 1978 through 1989. In 1990, Smith helped launch Southern Turf Management Magazine and served as editor. He also helped launch two other regional Turf and Landscape publications and launched and edited Florida Grove and Vegetable Management for the Farm Press Group. Within two years of launch, the turf magazines were well-respected, award-winning publications. Ron has received numerous awards for writing and photography in both agriculture and landscape journalism. He is past president of The Turf and Ornamental Communicators Association and was chosen as the first media representative to the University of Georgia College of Agriculture Advisory Board. He was named Communicator of the Year for the Metropolitan Atlanta Agricultural Communicators Association. Smith also worked in public relations, specializing in media relations for agricultural companies. Ron lives with his wife Pat in Denton, Texas. They have two grown children, Stacey and Nick, and two grandsons, Aaron and Hunter.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like