The market is increasingly turning its focus to demand prospects.
USDA’s ideas on demand, which are apparent in the November WASDE numbers, include:
Increased feed consumption
Feed/residual is projected to be up just 18 mbu versus 23-24 to 5.825 bbu. USDA is presumably assuming that a 45-50 cent decline (10%) in corn prices will stimulate feed demand – even in the face of a larger percentage reduction in soybean meal prices (expected to be 17% or $64 cheaper at $320/short ton in 2024-25). Animal numbers (Grain Consuming Animal Units or GCAUs in USDA terms) are expected to be unchanged at 101 million. Anecdotal comments suggest that lower feed costs and improved profitability of pork, beef and poultry are encouraging heavier weights and thus, more corn and meal per animal unit. Thus, there may be room for further increases in feed consumption.
Increased ethanol use
Corn used for ethanol production is off to a strong start, in large part due to an increase in exports. For example, the amount of corn used to support ethanol exports between January and September 2024 is nearly 150 mbu ahead of the previous year. Also, the USDA is forecasting a 28 mbu decline in corn demand for 2024-25. Yet, consumption for the month of September was 14 mbu, about 3% greater than a year ago. We note that a few analysts see corn used by the ethanol industry up 25 to 100 million mbu.
Export market
The area which offers the most potential for an increase in demand is the export market. Several forces are driving this:
Ukraine’s corn crop is 250 mbu smaller this year with exports forecast to decline by the same amount.
Russian, while not a huge player in global corn trade, has experienced a 20% smaller crop which is expected to trim exports by 50% or 130 mbu.
Brazil is coming off an 11% smaller corn crop. This 600 mbu reduction is expected to trim exports by nearly the same amount. However, Brazil’s domestic demand for both feed and especially ethanol is growing rapidly. So far, the pace of shipments from Brazil’s recent safrinha harvest is even further behind than what was originally projected.
Combining the export impact from the above the shippers suggests close to 980 mbu less corn will be moving into the world pipeline in 24-25.
A recovery in the Argentine crop from last year’s severe drought is expected to increase that country’s exports by around 300 mbu. Still, the net impact – 980 less 300 equals 680 mbu – is substantial and explains much of the surge in unshipped U.S. corn sales as shown in this graph.
One final and particularly important market is China, which imported approximately 15 MMT of Brazil corn between July 2023 through May 2024. July-October shipments this year have dropped to less than 700,000 tonnes. At first glance, this reduction is freeing up more corn for either Brazil’s domestic market or to meet other importer needs. However, the growth in Brazil’s internal use since the 2022-23 crop was harvested is expected to reach 16 MMT, suggesting little of the reduced Chinese demand will be switched to other importers.
Corn exports spike
Excluding China, U.S. export sales of corn are the second highest in the past 30 years. Export sales have spiked in recent weeks.
The following table provides data for those years in which corn exports were near or above the 2.3 bbu level as well as the quarterly distribution of shipments and the final stocks-to-use ratio for each. The graph shows July corn futures for each of those years.
The stx/use forecast of 11.3% for 2024-25 is based on exports of 2.6 bbu.
Years 2020-21 and 2021-22 had sub-10% final stocks to use ratios
CN futures in 2007-08 were supported by a 5-million-acre drop in planted area, declining production prospects early in the growing season and, at times, record feed/residual consumption before $7 corn rationed domestic demand.
Conclusion
Should a number of the supply/demand factors noted above fall into place, a 2.5-2.6 bbu U.S. export program could lift CN above the $5 level later in the year.
Contact Advance Trading at (800) 747-9021 or visit www.advance-trading.com.
Information provided may include opinions of the author and is subject to the following disclosures:
The risk of trading futures and options can be substantial. All information, publications, and material used and distributed by Advance Trading Inc. shall be construed as a solicitation. ATI does not maintain an independent research department as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.71. Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed by Advance Trading Inc. Past performance does not necessarily indicate future results.
The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of Farm Futures or Farm Progress.
About the Author
You May Also Like