Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: IA
weeds in a field
SURVIVORS: The presence of herbicide-resistant weeds in a cropping system means that weed management changes must be made.

Finding a realistic goal for weed management

Can waterhemp be eradicated? Probably not.

By Bob Hartzler

The current approach to weed management in Iowa is at risk due to rapid expansion of herbicide-resistant weeds. To preserve the efficacy of herbicides, two things must happen: adopt integrated weed management, and shift the goal of weed management from protecting crop yields to minimizing the size of the weed seed bank. The first requires a shift in behavior; the second a change in attitude.

At a recent industry-sponsored field day, a speaker discussed his company’s soybean herbicide portfolio and the unique problems posed by waterhemp. He addressed the issues, including a statement that farmers should strive to eradicate waterhemp from their fields. As I walked to the next station I was approached by several of the company reps. They were seeking my opinion on their suggestion that we attempt to eradicate waterhemp and other problem weeds.

What do I think about eradicating waterhemp? It’s a pipedream. People involved in pest management long ago gave up on the idea of eradicating established pests. The goals for managing pests at different stages of invasion include: prevention, eradication, containment and control. We are long past the point where it is feasible to eradicate or contain waterhemp or any of our common weeds. Waterhemp is native to Iowa and the western Corn Belt. We can realistically talk about eradicating Palmer amaranth in much of Iowa, in some areas we are probably at the containment stage.

Having said that, I don’t have a problem promoting the concept of waterhemp eradication. Another company has promoted the concept of “zero seed threshold,” with the goal of preventing production of any weed seed within a field. I don’t think this is an achievable goal on the scale of today’s agriculture. However, there is nothing wrong with setting high goals for weed management if it will change behavior.

The widespread acceptance of late-emerging waterhemp escapes that don’t pose a threat to yield or harvest efficiency is the engine driving the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in this species. Anything that can be done to change this behavior will pay long-term dividends. If promoting weed eradication or zero-seed thresholds can change attitudes toward weed management and promote the adoption of integrated pest management, I am all in.

Hartzler is an ISU Extension weed management specialist.

 

 

 

TAGS: Weeds
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish