Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Syngenta settles with Nebraska farmer ahead of trial

RGtimeline/ThinkstockPhotos Corn piles at grain elevator.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

by Margaret Cronin Fisk and Jef Feeley

Syngenta AG reached a confidential settlement with a Nebraska farmer who claimed the company mishandled marketing of its genetically modified seed, causing U.S. corn prices to plummet.

With the settlement, Syngenta averts a trial that was scheduled to start July 10. Terms weren’t disclosed.

Two weeks ago, Syngenta lost a $218 million jury verdict for a class of Kansas farmers who brought similar claims against the Swiss agrochemical company, which has been acquired by China National Chemical Corp. The Basel-based company completed its $43 billion takeover by ChemChina in June. 

Syngenta faces its next class action in a Minnesota court in August, where farmers are seeking more than $600 million.

Settlement Reached

The company reached the settlement with farmer Daniel Mensik last week, as a scheduled trial neared in state court in Minnesota, plaintiffs’ attorney Mikal Watts said Thursday by phone. The settlement was confirmed by the court.

The farmers claim Syngenta rushed its GMO seed to market before getting approval from China to export the grain there. In 2013, China stopped shipments after calling the corn contaminated by the GMO seed, setting off a five-year depression in prices, the farmers claim. They also allege Syngenta misled them on when the Chinese would approve the seed. 

The settlement may not have implications for the rest of the cases, said Anthony Sabino, a law professor at St. John’s University in New York.

“Call it a tactical retreat,” he said. “Most likely, Syngenta felt the case of a single farmer versus the big corporation was too risky to take to trial, and the dollars paid were within an acceptable range.”

Case Facts 

Syngenta has disputed the damages claimed by farmers, or that it did anything wrong. The company didn’t sell the seed until approved by the U.S. and didn’t need Chinese approval, Syngenta lawyers have argued. Paul Minehart, Syngenta spokesman, declined to comment Friday. 

Mensik’s claim was set to be the first to trial in the corn litigation in April, but that ended in a mistrial when the judge couldn’t find enough jurors. Mensik, who has a 300 acre-farm in Morse Bluff, Nebraska, claims he lost $125,000 in sales because of Syngenta’s mishandling of the GMO corn.

“We’re hopeful that Dan and Bonnie Mensik are the first of tens of thousands of farmers who recover their damages from Syngenta,’’ said Watts, plaintiffs’ attorney.

The federal judge overseeing multiple class actions in Kansas set several trial dates Thursday for additional class actions to be tried in that court. The claims of Arkansas and Missouri farmers will go forward in January, while Illinois and Nebraska go to trial in April. 

The case is Mensik v. Syngenta, 27-CV-15-16826, District Court for Hennepin County, Minnesota (Minneapolis). 

--With assistance from Todd Melby. 

To contact the reporters on this story: Margaret Cronin Fisk in Detroit at [email protected]; Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware at [email protected]

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Elizabeth Wollman at [email protected]

Paul Cox, Andrew Martin

© 2017 Bloomberg L.P

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.