For all of you who have used direct payments to help secure your operating loans over the last few years, here’s a news flash: You didn’t need those. They’re just a drain on the Treasury and shouldn’t have been made.

For those of you who received marketing loan payments when prices dropped below the cost of production a few years back: Return those to the government. What were you thinking; that the government should help make sure you continue to produce abundant amounts of food, fuel, feed and fiber?

For those of you who took out federal crop insurance, which you could not have afforded if you had had to pay the full premium, either turn the policy back in or pay the government the premium subsidy. That was all a mistake Congress should have avoided.

Sound nonsensical? Well, meet Vincent Smith, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, who also apparently works (sometimes) as an agricultural economist at Montana State University. Dr. Smith and his associates think the recent farm programs were all a mistake and that you and the country would have been better off without them.

In recent weeks, AEI has sent out a series of press releases attacking the farm bill versions written by the House and Senate. Some of those have been picked up and printed in full by ag media outlets such as Farmers Hotline.

In one, Smith asked what would happen if Congress failed to pass a farm bill by Oct. 1. “Not much,” Smith answered. “The sky won’t fall, Chicken Little will mend the bump on his head from the acorn, and U.S. agricultural (sector), which the USDA predicts will earn record revenues and profits from its 2012 crops, livestock sales and government subsidies, will continue to enjoy a banner year.”

Smith says farm organizations have been claiming the sky is falling because Congress failed to pass a new farm bill before it recessed for the Nov. 6 elections. The truth is, he said, many farm programs have their own funding mechanisms and will continue unaffected.

Farmers know that isn’t the case, and that some programs have already ended because the funding expired at the end of the government’s fiscal year on Sept. 30. But little details like that don’t matter to the American Enterprise Institute scholars.

Unfortunately, members of Congress who oppose farm programs will use such rhetoric for political cover when they face the voters over the next few days. And farmers who suffered losses due to this year’s drought and other weather disasters will just have to “do the best they can.”